President Goodluck Jonathan has been urged to sack Colonel Tony Nyiam (rtd) from the Presidential Advisory Committee on the proposed national dialogue and prosecute him for attacking Governor of Edo State, Adams Oshiomhole.
Civil rights organization, African Network for Environmental and Economic Justice made the call on Thursday and demanded an apology from Nyiam to the governor and the people of the South-South extraction for bungling the discussions in Benin City while collating views of the people of the south-south geo-political zone on modalities for the conference. The group also accused Col. Nyiam of working in concert with some political thugs to abruptly halt proceedings as a result of their inability to respect the governor’s alternative views.
“If historical antecedents of Col. Tony Nyiam is anything to go by, we recall his active participation in a coup d’état led by Gideon Gwarzo Okar, which sought to topple the Ibrahim Babangida dictatorship in 1990 and, later pardoned by the Abdulsalami Abubakar regime,” Executive Director of ANEEJ, Rev. David Ugolor wrote in a statement released in Abuja accused.
“It is, therefore, not surprising that such a character could jump up from his seat as an organiser of the consultation to shout down a serving state governor who was only expressing his personal opinion.
“We condemn Col. Tony Nyiam’s actions and we call on him to tender a public apology to Comrade Adams Oshiomhole and Nigerians of South South extraction. We therefore call on President Goodluck Jonathan to sack Col. Tony Nyiam (rtd) from the committee and prosecute him for violating the right of a citizen, a serving state governor for that matter, for expressing himself in an honest and frank manner.”
The statement argued that the action has exposed the fears of many Nigerians towards the proposed national dialogue.
“The choice of personalities like Nyiam as member of the presidential Advisory committee truly speaks volumes of what is to come out of the proposed national dialogue. His presence in the committee is ironical, this is because Nyiam’s antecedents betrays a national dialogue.
“In a democracy, there is freedom of speech and no individual or group can volunteer to violate the rights of other citizens from expressing themselves in the preparation of a national dialogue that, in itself, seeks to bring people together to express themselves.
“We now wonder what the planned conference seeks to achieve if people are expected to say only what the committee wants to hear. We are left with the impression that the planned national dialogue will not be different from others previously organised national jamborees where public funds are brazenly wasted on unprofitable ventures.”
