The Nigerian government’s latest gambit in the fight against terrorism – a border fence – is a tragicomic policy misfire. President Bola Tinubu’s quiet approval of this strategy, announced by Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Christopher Musa at a recent security conference, reflects not just desperation, but a fundamental misunderstanding of both the nature of terrorism and the scale of Nigeria’s border crisis. The comparison to Pakistan and Saudi Arabia is not just misleading; it is deeply unserious, if not outright absurd and pig-headed.
Geographic Impossibility: A Fence Built on Delusion
Nigeria’s land borders span over 4,000 kilometers across four volatile neighbors—Niger, Chad, Cameroon, and Benin. These are not neat, flat lines on a map. They stretch across forests, deserts, rivers, marshes, and mountains. Building a continuous, secure, and maintained barrier in such terrain is a logistical nightmare. Maintaining it, in the face of natural erosion, sabotage, and insurgent infiltration, would require more resources than Nigeria’s entire current security budget.
This isn’t just expensive. It’s geopolitical fantasy.
Security by Symbolism: Walls Do Not Stop Terrorists
The suggestion that a physical barrier could deter hardened, mobile, ideologically-driven terrorists who navigate across vast deserts with motorcycles, trucks, and local informants is laughable. These are not ordinary criminals hopping fences. These are insurgents who have outsmarted multinational joint task forces, drone surveillance, and entire military battalions. Boko Haram and its splinters have operated inside Nigeria for more than a decade with or without open borders. Their strength lies in exploiting weak institutions, poverty, local grievances, and corrupt border officials—not open landscapes. A wall won’t fix what weak governance, broken policing, and failing intelligence have allowed to fester.
3. Economic Waste and Elite Contracting
This “border wall” is almost certainly not about security. It smells far more like a cash cow for a corrupt elite – another multi-billion-naira project where the true intention is to funnel contracts to cronies under the guise of patriotism. The fencing of Nigeria’s entire northern border would require hundreds of billions of naira in materials, surveillance equipment, road construction, outposts, and armed personnel. In a country that cannot provide consistent electricity or even protect its capital from bandit incursions, the idea that it can build and maintain a 4,000 km wall is not just absurd; it is offensive.
4. A Dangerous Distraction from Real Reform
The announcement of the fence coincided with the unveiling of efforts to localize military procurement and revive the Defence Industries Corporation of Nigeria (DICON). These are worthy goals, aimed at long-term sustainability. But the fence risks becoming the flagship distraction, a flashy, doomed-to-fail policy that diverts attention and resources from real reform. Insurgency in Nigeria is fueled by local discontent, governance failures, ungoverned spaces, and porous human intelligence, not by a lack of concrete walls. Any plan that ignores those root causes is at best a distraction, and at worst, a deception.
5. Diplomatic Blowback and Regional Isolation
The fence idea also threatens fragile regional diplomacy. ECOWAS is already fractured following the departure of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger. Building a physical wall across these borders could be interpreted as a hostile act; cementing Nigeria’s mistrust in its neighbors and further undermining the cooperation needed to share intelligence, conduct joint operations, and pursue cross-border militants.
Walls isolate. Nigeria cannot fight terrorism in a vacuum.
CONCLUSION: A Fence Cannot Fix a Failed State
The Tinubu administration’s border fence plan is not merely misguided; it is insulting to the intelligence of Nigerians. At best, it is symbolic posturing. At worst, it is a corrupt boondoggle dressed in the fatigues of patriotism. The solution to terrorism lies in a modern, intelligence-led, community-anchored, and regionally-coordinated strategy. That means drones, satellites, local partnerships, economic development, and accountable governance; not barbed wire and concrete walls across jungles and deserts. To waste money on a wall is to build a monument to policy failure. And if President Tinubu truly wants to secure Nigeria’s future, he must tear down this wall of delusion, before it’s ever built.
