The Presidency has rebuked the Catholic Bishop of Sokoto Diocese, Dr. Matthew Kukah over his comments about the persecution of Christians in Nigeria by armed extremist groups in the North.
Responding to the outspoken cleric, the presidency described Kukah’s comments as “unfortunate and disappointing”, decrying the fact that Kukah “castigated” Nigeria before the US lawmakers.
The Presidency’s statement had the title ‘Response by the Presidency to the statement made by Bishop Kukah before the United States Congress’.
Kukah had in a virtual address on July 14 before the American lawmakers criticized the handling of the insecurity in Nigeria by President Muhammadu Buhari. He declared that the Federal Government is helpless in tackling the security challenges Nigeria is facing. He also accused the president of nepotism.
Responding to Kukah’s claims, the Presidency in a statement signed by Senior Special Assistant to the President, Media & Publicity, Garba Shehu noted that it was “troubling when a so-called man of the Church copies the worst excesses of those seeking personal advancement in public office.”
According to Shehu, Kukah’s claim that only Christian schools are being “targeted by bandits or terrorists is not supported by the facts on the ground.”
Shehu cited cases of Islamic students being kidnapped. The statement says that:
“Sad but true that Kankara students in Katsina State were stolen by bandits of the same Islamic faith as those they took away.
“The same may be true of those who are still holding the 134 students of the Islamic School at Tegina in Niger State.
“The nation witnessed the sad incident of the female students abducted by bandits at Jangebe in Zamfara State and the over 100 predominantly Muslim students of the Federal Government Girls College Birnin Yauri in Kebbi State who are currently in captivity- and the nation’s security agencies are hard at work to release them unharmed.
“The attack on Christian students is sad and unacceptable; so also is the abduction of students of other faiths. The claim that only Christian schools are being targeted is totally untrue.”
The Presidency expressed disappointment that some citizens threw their weight behind Kukah following his comments.
“It is unfortunate, and disappointing, for citizens of Nigeria to bear witness to one of their Churchmen castigating their country in front of representatives of a foreign parliament,” it said.
Continuing its challenge of Kukah’s claim, the statement said: “To suggest that investment in infrastructure between Nigeria and Niger is wasteful and biased – when a similar infrastructure project between Lagos and Benin has revolutionised the two neighbouring economies to the advantage of both our countries – is quite disturbing.
“There is no bias in this government when the president is northern and Muslim, the vice president southern and Christian, and the cabinet equally balanced between the two religions.
“But neither is there anything in our Constitution to state that political posts must be apportioned according to ethnicity or faith. It takes a warped frame of mind for a critic to believe ethnicity is of primary importance in public appointments.
“It is yet more troubling to hear a Churchman isolating one group for criticism purely on ethnic lines.”
“As a nation and a people, we must together define evil as evil. We must not allow our religious differences to divide us.
“No one gains but the evildoers when we divide our ranks according to ethnicity and religion in confronting them.
“The bandit, kidnapper, and terrorist are the enemies of the people who should be confronted in unison.”
