ubamobile

access ad

ziva

Fri. May 9th, 2025 12:10:42 PM
Spread the love

Hundreds of protesters yesterday morning stormed the headquarters of Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) in Abuja, where the trial of Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, was scheduled to hold. The protests, organized by the Coalition of United Political Party (CUPP), were led by the National Chairman, Action Peoples Party (APP), Ikenga Imo Ugochinyere; who feared the CCT Chairman, Justice Danladi Umar would issue a warrant of arrest against Onnoghen. Armed with placards with various inscriptions such as: “Amaechi, El-Rufai, Akpabio, Malami, APC; brains behind Onnoghen’s trial”, and “CCT trail of Onnoghen is unconstitutional”, the protesters were blocked at the CCT main gate where policemen were providing security.

The protests continued, after the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) rejected High Court orders and request restraining it from hearing charges against by the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen. The CCT members in a split two to one decision refused the CJN’s application for indefinite adjournment and said the orders by the High Courts were not binding on the CCT. But the APP chairman argued that the CCT acted ultra vires. “The 1999 Constitution is very clear on how a judicial officer and particularly, the CJN can leave office before the age of retirement,” Ugochinyere said, urging Nigerians to resist what he alleged was a move by the government to muzzle the judiciary.

“We register our apprehension over the persecution of the CJN, the plot to remove him from office illegally and install another to help All Progressives Congress (APC) get a favorable judgement from the Supreme Court in the Rivers and Zamfara APC crises, where they are afraid they will lose elections. Nigerians are also witnesses to their failed plot to also annex the National Assembly; the Nigerian people and the judiciary resisted the invasion. Lawyers in defence of democracy are hereby called upon to march on the streets to defend our nation’s democracy. On 30th October 2016, we also marched following the midnight gestapo-like invasion of the homes of judges on the 7th of October 2016, by security agents. Then, we warned about the plan of the APC-led Federal Government to intimidate the judiciary and annex it.”

In the dissenting ruling, CCT chairman Justice Danladi Umar and the female member of the panel, Justice Julie Anabor, discountenanced the orders of the other courts, arguing that they were made by courts of equal jurisdiction, and CCT being a unique court empowered to handle issues exclusively relating to assets declaration, cannot be bound by their orders. He explained that section 246 of the constitution is very categorical that CCT has unquantified jurisdiction to hear any assets declaration case as may be referred to it by the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB). He also disagreed with the request to adjourn the trial sine die on the ground of a pending appeal at the Court of Appeal. According to him, section 306 of the 2015 Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), does not make provisions for stay of proceedings in a criminal matter and in the instant case, it shall not be entertained.

The second member, William Agwadza Atedze in a dissenting opinion, agreed with the CJN that with the orders by the High Courts and the appeal before the Court of Appeal, it was necessary for the CCT to adjourn indefinitely pending when the issue of jurisdiction was resolved. He held that the CCB cannot be in isolation, and went ahead to uphold the argument of the defence counsel, Wole Olanipekun (SAN) that the matter be adjourned sine die pending the outcome of motions in other courts.

Atedze held that it would result in judicial anarchy for the tribunal to proceed with the trial in view of the four subsisting court orders and the pending appeal at the Court of Appeal. According to him, orders are binding on the tribunal until they are set aside in view of section 287(3) of the 1999 Constitution, which allows court orders to be enforced in all parts of the county. He said: “Having summarized argument from both parties, it is my submission that CCT as a creation of law is bound by the existing court orders to avoid judicial anarchy.”

He held that the issue of jurisdiction of the tribunal to entertain the charge against CJN must first be resolved, and that status quo must be maintained by adjoining proceedings sine die until all contending issues are resolved. Following the ruling, Justice Umar ordered that the motion challenging the jurisdiction of the tribunal be moved immediately.

However, counsel to the defendant, Olanipekun, informed the tribunal that the response of the complainant (Federal Government) was served on him late Monday and as such, would need time to study the response. The counsel to the Federal Government, Aliyu Umar, agreed that the government’s response was served late on the defendant, making the tribunal chairman to adjourn further proceedings till Monday, January 28.

Olanipekun has vowed to appeal the CCT ruling, dismissing the orders of three high courts and the National Industrial Court that restrained it from proceeding with the arraignment of Onnoghen by the Code of Conduct Bureau. He said the notice of appeal to be filed at the Court of Appeal in Abuja was already in progress and would be filed any time soonest. He added that while appeal would not necessarily be about Onnoghen, it is about strengthening Nigeria’s jurisprudence.

The CJN has been in the eye of the storm in the past two weeks following alleged false assets declaration brought against him by the government. Consequently, he was scheduled to be arraigned on January 14. The arraignment was halted over irregular service. But shortly after, four motions were filed at the Federal High Court and the National Industrial Court, Abuja, all seeking court orders to stall the planned arraignment and trial. The orders were granted. The CJN on Monday obtained another order from the Court of Appeal that the status quo should be maintained. But the tribunal yesterday declared them null and void.

Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) Chairman, Justice Danladi Umar

About the author: Emmanuel Asiwe admin
Tell us something about yourself.

By admin